The first convention of the Future and Freedom marked a pivotal moment for Italian politics, for some even historic lines.
For 17 years, political life has been locked in a sometimes cloying, referendum on the person of Silvio Berlusconi, and already this is an anomaly in the anomaly. The dispute, in fact, not about ideas or proposals for Berlusconi and his coalition, but Berlusconi was addressed to man, the entrepreneur Berlusconi, the Prime Minister Berlusconi, the opposition leader Berlusconi.
Many fought and tore their clothes for the ad personam laws, focusing national attention on problems which are completely secondary to the real citizens.
should not blame the chairman of the board than those that are its (many) responsibilities: if the problems of youth, employment, employment, environment, innovation etc. have gone into the background for so long, it was also because the current opposition has always preferred instrumental attack Berlusconi for his most obvious limitations, but less damaging to the community, rather than nailed to the failure to achieve these reforms and promises so much and relied on never implemented.
This game massacre has done nothing but divide and tear apart a country that, however, had a desperate need to get a national feeling, and why not?, Patriotic to get out of the shallows where it was stranded after tangentopoli. From
exchange of ideas compared to personalities: the left had no hope of beating Berlusconi on his land, and in fact, trying to imitate the model, probably unconsciously, he ended up copying the vices but not qualities, which also exist.
In this scenario, was acquired in the center, an almost mystical conception of Silvio Berlusconi, not only the leader was always him - it must be admitted that this award if it was earned on the field, despite not playing on equal terms with its colleagues, but this argument deserves a wider and deeper debate - but it was not unthinkable that there could be any form of criticism in his work. More than
Caesarism, in fact, I was getting closer to a kind of dogmatism are charged, in which words and actions of Berlusconi were always true and fair regardless, no ifs, ands or buts. So, after "the leader is always right", had come to the axiom "the president (granted and implied that the chairman in question was B) is always right", with the corollary seemingly superfluous "and those who contradict it is always wrong and, at worst, is also a Communist. " In the face of liberal thought!
What seemed impossible was really questioning the prime minister.
It 's true that the various electoral systems that have followed have created a semi-de facto, even if not incorporated in the Constitution, but from here inviolability of the Chairperson of the step is long.
Here, Gianfranco Fini, perhaps belatedly, perhaps in a very heavy, but certainly without hypocrisy, did something completely normal, he says that things as they were, could not go on.
Speaker of the House was certainly more honest than many characters orbiting Berlusconi, who is behind an extreme servility, and hid the secret well hidden desire to take power, not the place of the head, as soon as they had failed (politically speaking).
These people have done much worse in the PDL and Berlusconi, Italy and consequently, any statement of Fini.
policy, if not challenging his players, could really become a representation of the ephemeral, a play with characters who all want to do except look for an author, preferred to choose a master.
Fini has just pointed out, Berlusconi and Italy, that nobody is perfect, that we can all be questioned and that the common interest of the statement is the first staff.
is why today, I do not want to be of interest in ornithology, I believe that the return policy is much more important: if Berlusconi really wants to survive himself and recur at the helm of the nation, should not be guided by his enormous ego, but will choose the dialectic and the comparison, ie the tools to transform the political politician in something bigger and important for all of us and for our Italy.
In this scenario, was acquired in the center, an almost mystical conception of Silvio Berlusconi, not only the leader was always him - it must be admitted that this award if it was earned on the field, despite not playing on equal terms with its colleagues, but this argument deserves a wider and deeper debate - but it was not unthinkable that there could be any form of criticism in his work. More than
Caesarism, in fact, I was getting closer to a kind of dogmatism are charged, in which words and actions of Berlusconi were always true and fair regardless, no ifs, ands or buts. So, after "the leader is always right", had come to the axiom "the president (granted and implied that the chairman in question was B) is always right", with the corollary seemingly superfluous "and those who contradict it is always wrong and, at worst, is also a Communist. " In the face of liberal thought!
What seemed impossible was really questioning the prime minister.
It 's true that the various electoral systems that have followed have created a semi-de facto, even if not incorporated in the Constitution, but from here inviolability of the Chairperson of the step is long.
Here, Gianfranco Fini, perhaps belatedly, perhaps in a very heavy, but certainly without hypocrisy, did something completely normal, he says that things as they were, could not go on.
Speaker of the House was certainly more honest than many characters orbiting Berlusconi, who is behind an extreme servility, and hid the secret well hidden desire to take power, not the place of the head, as soon as they had failed (politically speaking).
These people have done much worse in the PDL and Berlusconi, Italy and consequently, any statement of Fini.
policy, if not challenging his players, could really become a representation of the ephemeral, a play with characters who all want to do except look for an author, preferred to choose a master.
Fini has just pointed out, Berlusconi and Italy, that nobody is perfect, that we can all be questioned and that the common interest of the statement is the first staff.
is why today, I do not want to be of interest in ornithology, I believe that the return policy is much more important: if Berlusconi really wants to survive himself and recur at the helm of the nation, should not be guided by his enormous ego, but will choose the dialectic and the comparison, ie the tools to transform the political politician in something bigger and important for all of us and for our Italy.
0 comments:
Post a Comment